The
old saying goes that the only things guaranteed in life are death
and taxes. Telephone people like to say that the only things
guaranteed are death, taxes, and dial tone. While telephone
companies have been able to add revenue with things like call
forwarding, caller ID, call waiting, voice mail, and long distance,
these items have quickly become standard fare and are now expected
by the public pushing profit margins on them back and creating a
situation where, as always, TelCos are forced to try to make a
living on the equivalent of basic rates of $8 to $10 as mandated by
the Federal government and the market. Because of the cost involved
in sending out a repairman, a truck roll, to fix a problem with your
telephone will put the telephone company in the hole for several
months to come on the revenue stream coming from the service that
they sell you, a Telco’s financial success depends on your telephone
service being 99.999% reliable. They call this the "five
nines".
Maintaining
the five nines, in the face of technological advancement, hasn’t
been easy as the nation’s telecommunications backbone has expanded.
The first switches, before the advent of solid state, used
electro-mechanical relays, that were prone to not making contact as
they closed, to connect your call from one end of the country to the
other. The longer the distance that your call had to travel, the
more relays that had to close, and the better the chances that your
call would not go through. Rather than try to ask consumers, who
would not understand the enormity of the task at hand when placing a
call from New York to San Francisco, to patiently retry to make
their connection until it went through, TelCos would have an
operator make the call for you. This established the axiom early on
that the more equipment in a network, the less reliable the network
was going to be.
As
electro-mechanical switches were replaced with solid state and a
myriad of accompanying switch software problems were resolved, the
economics of the rapid expansion dictated the advent of the Digital
Loop Carrier. As the population rapidly increased, a TelCo’s ability
to keep up depended on their ability to coax enough profit out of
their networks to make loan payments to pay for the installation of
expensive cable runs. DLC’s, as they’re called, were more cost
effective in that they multiplexed many calls over individual wires
and eliminated the need for much of the new cabling requirement.
Adding DLCs to the network, however, added more equipment and
decreased the reliability and the initial DLCs were anything but
reliable as they brought equipment and software problems of their
own into the fray.
As the industry was struggling through this
introduction, it was also asked to bear some of the brunt of the
introduction of teletypes, modems and fax machines, which was
largely outside of TelCo control. Since teletype, voice and fax data
closely resembles voice data, the first time that a TelCo would know
that one of these devices was connected to a telephone line was
often when they would get a call complaining that a fax or modem
didn’t work on a working phone line. In order to keep their
subscribers happy, TelCos had to learn not to be abrupt with their
customers and coax them into accepting that the problem was not a
problem with their telephone line while bearing the cost of doing
so. Add to this the same types of problems that were introduced with
the Internet and the increase in time that individual users would
demand from connections, which were normally shared amongst varying
numbers of customers, and the TelCos suddenly found themselves
struggling against an opponent that they did not choose.
As Internet customers demanded more and more speed out
of a copper network that could not carry data at the rates that
subscribers were demanding, TelCos found themselves in a situation
where they could not possibly suddenly replace trillions of dollars
worth of copper with the fiber that would be required. DSL
technology was introduced that would coax higher transmission rates
out of copper with a combination of hardware and firmware
algorithms, but as usual, the initial technology was extremely
unreliable and taxing on a TelCo’s ability to survive.
Now, with the writing on the wall demanding a more
robust and higher speed network, TelCos once again finding
themselves making a transition in the face of growing clamor for
more government intervention in and regulation of their privately
owned networks that will only hamper their ability to do so. The
introduction of IP for all telecommunications adds another batch of
currently less reliable equipment and software to a network that
must be reliable in order for it to survive. Routers, while they
have improved substantially, are nothing more than glorified PCs and
while consumers have grown accustomed to turning their computers off
and back on when they lock up, they will not do the same for their
telephone lines.
We must take our hats off to these companies who have
faced this epic struggle on our behalves while providing a service
that has been largely responsible for the country’s development.
History tells us that they will once again prevail and provide us
with a service that is, like death and taxes, something that we can
depend on. Their existence depends on it.