|
Categories - Copywriting - Shopping - Free Online Business Help - Telecommunications
Services
Articles: Family - Your Social
Security
Then
as now, after much argument about whether it would be good thing or
would, in the end, cost more jobs in an economy that was struggling
to recover from the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt introduced
the Social Security (FICA) Program in 1935 as part of the New Deal.
The initial act did not apply to all people or job categories
equally and, when the Supreme Court began to question the
constitutionality of the bill, FDR proposed legislation that would
allow him to add and appoint more judges to federal courts including
the Supreme Court. The 51 new judges that he proposed would tip the
judicial branch in his favor if they were put into
office.
FDR promised that participation in the Program
would be completely voluntary, and that participants would only have
to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into the
Program. The tax is now 7.65% of everything up to $102,000 and must
be matched with employer-contributed funds. Since companies add the
cost of taxes and fees to the prices of the products that they
manufacture, this is now over a 16% tax burden placed on the
economy.
FDR
also promise that the money the participants elected to put into the
Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each
year, but the tax is no longer tax deductible adding to the actual
burden that the population and the economy are expected to bear. FDR
also said that annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed
as income. Under Clinton, that was changed so that up to 85% of your
Social Security income can now be taxed. Al Gore cast the deciding
vote in the Senate to allow the change to go through. Even though
the original intent was to keep the elderly from slipping into
poverty when they retired, current social security benefits are well
below poverty level.
FDR
specified that the money collected would be put into the independent
Trust Fund rather than into the general operating fund, and
therefore would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement
Program and no other Government program. Under Johnson, who was
looking for ways to finance his war in Viet Nam, the money was moved
to the General Fund and spent on other federal
programs.
In
1960, the Supreme Court ruled that no one has a contractual right to
the Social Security funds that they have paid in under the program
while, at the same time, Congress has added to the number and
classifications of people who may receive benefits. Under the Carter
administration, the federal government began issuing Social Security
payments to immigrants who had never paid a dime into the program.
At the same time, slow economic growth with high unemployment and
double digit inflation, called stagflation, caused the actual value
of social security payments to decline and nothing was done to
alleviate the pressure on the elderly who saw their meager standard
of living rapidly evaporating. During these economic trying times,
Carter increased Social Security withholding from 3% to 6.15% while
guaranteeing that the increase would insure the viability of a
program that was already in trouble through 2030.
Several thousand employees of Galveston County,
Texas were allowed to opt out of the Social Security program in the
early 1980s, and have their money placed in a private retirement
plan instead. While employees who earned $50,000 per year would have
collected $1,302 per month in Social Security benefits, the private
plan paid them $6,843 per month. While employees who earned $20,000
per year would have collected $775 per month in Social Security
benefits, the private plan paid them $2,740 per month, at interest
rates prevailing in 1996.
While
millions of Americans now depend on Social Security and the stated
intent of the original Social Security program sounded good, a
population that was suffering as a result of financial malfeasance
during the Great Depression was simply taken advantage of and
continues to be taken advantage of today. Congress is quick to tell
the population that the Social Security system is broken, but they
are not quick to tell anyone or even admit as to who was/is the
culprit. As with most social programs under our socialized form of
government, social security is simply being used to get politicians
elected.
While we can’t, in good conscience, simply cut
the people off who survive on Social Security, we have to realize
that this was simply a trap devised to put us in a position where we
would be more dependent on and under the control of the federal
government. We were preyed upon when we were at our weakest and
we have to figure a way out of this socialist quagmire that is
draining the nation of prosperity and freedom at the rate of $650
billion per year.
|