|
Samples: Articles - Global Warming Scientists
and people who buy into their disaster theories understandably base
their fear on educated catastrophical predictions. If you transfer
this tendency to the Earth and consider that the entire Earth as we
know it exists in a balance, plus or minus a few percentage points,
of the composition and heating of chemicals in the air and on the
surface, it’s easy to see that an unnatural shift in this balance
could result in a number of catastrophical events. At
an average of 30 miles below your feet, temperatures exist that
would erase any record of your existence. Your matter would still
exist but no one would know who it belonged to. The thickness of the
Earth’s crust varies from thin at the poles and under the cooling
ocean to thicker at the equatorial land masses as a result of higher
temperatures and centrifugal force. The thickness of the crust is
also maintained by the relative cooling on the Earth’s surface. Just
like ice cubes dropped in a bucket of water, the ice packs at the
poles have a cooling effect on the entire surface. C02 retains more
heat than O2 or H1. An unnatural increase in C02 could result in
melting of the ice packs which would result in the warming of the
entire Earth, resulting in a reduction of the thickness of the crust
resulting in vast areas of boiling lava on the surface, resulting in
more C02 release, resulting in more surface warming, resulting in
boiling oceans, resulting in a further reduction of the thickness of
the crust and so on until the entire planet’s surface consists of
boiling lava. Once the process is started, it would be completed in
your lifetime. Current
plant life is dependent upon current C02 levels for its existence
and mankind is dependent upon the current balance of plant life for
its existence. Unnatural increases in C02 would most likely result
in additional new plant life. As a result of warmer temperatures and
increased C02 levels, we can’t predict what this additional plant or
bacterial life might be. As you know, some plant life is poisonous
to human beings. Plants not only generate oxygen but also release a
wide range of other chemicals, spores, and pollen into the air and
on the surface. Rainwater washes some of the chemicals on plant
surfaces to the ground where they eventually become part of our
water table or are washed out to sea. The evaporation process over
the ocean that purifies our rainwater also draws other chemicals
into the air where they are eventually re-deposited on the Earth’s
surface. An unnatural increase in C02 levels could easily result in
a new strain of plant life that would poison our air and our water.
A layer of new plant life could also release heavier gasses forcing
oxygen and C02 above the level of human and plant life consumption
result in the suffocation of all other life on the
planet. The
most unstable supporting feature of life on the planet is our
magnetic field. It blocks and filters harmful rays from the sun that
would kill everything. It is known to often seek new poles and
occasionally reverse its direction. Electrons are not little round
balls of energy that orbit around their nuclei. An electron is an
amount of energy vapor that is kept captive by its attraction to its
nucleus in opposition to its self. As iron and other high atomic
weight elements are converted to gasses by the high temperatures and
fusion as a result of the high compression at the core of the Earth,
energy is released as electrons disband them selves. Energy opposes
its self and seeks areas where there is less energy or areas where
an attraction has been created by needy nuclei. Energy radiates
outwardly from all areas of the planet. However, less energy is
being released at the cooler poles so more energy flows towards
these lower energy areas. As energy is released at the poles, it is
attracted back to the Earth by its massive number of needy nuclei
more than it is attracted to a relatively empty embryonic space
where, on average, only one un-needy nucleus exists per CCM. At the
same time, it is opposed by energy being released all over the
Earth’s surface. Eventually, it finds that a lesser amount of energy
is being released at one of the poles than the other and rushes
towards the relatively lower energy pole forcing the energy being
released at that pole back in the opposite direction. A current is
established resulting in the Earth’s electromagnetic field. An
unnatural variation in temperatures at the Earth’s poles will
disrupt this precarious balance and result in the released energy
constantly seeking poles. As the temperatures become closer to equal
all over the planet, it becomes harder and harder for poles to
become established. Without poles, protective energy will not be
concentrated into a current and simply be forced into space. The sun
will kill all life.
When
you consider the possibilities, it’s easy to see how those inclined
to do so might become paranoid and hysterical about a mild warming
period. However, in the long run, it would probably be best not to
risk screwing around with Mother Nature. If we develop natural non-polluting alternative fuel sources, the rich will lose their revenue stream from oil production but we will lose nothing. Our oil jobs will be replaced by new energy industry jobs. If the rich finance development, their revenue stream will also be replaced. If we don’t do this, everyone might lose everything. The only risk is in not doing it. |